
This text has been written with the critical help of an AI, using my notes and references with improved grammar and cohesion. AI also helps extracting relevant titles from my writing.
Marketing is a strategic, communicative discipline aimed at influencing consumer behavior and driving demand by identifying, anticipating and fulfilling perceived needs within target audiences. Through the creation and promotion of symbolic, cultural and material value, marketing connects producers with consumers within socio-economic structures, often emphasizing values tied to consumption, identity and lifestyle. Critical perspectives suggest that marketing not only responds to existing desires but also actively shapes them, embedding itself in cultural norms and ideologies. In doing so, marketing can reinforce social hierarchies, perpetuate consumer-driven values and contribute to environmental and social externalities by prioritizing profit and engagement over sustainability and ethical considerations.
Reinforcing ideology
Marketing serves as a powerful tool for perpetuating capitalist values, framing nearly every aspect of life through the lens of the market and turning human needs, identities and relationships into goods to be exchanged. In this process, marketing doesn’t just respond to demand but actively constructs it, reinforcing a worldview where worth and meaning are tied to consumption. This market-driven perspective contributes to what philosopher Bernard Stiegler describes as “symbolic misery,” a condition in which authentic cultural expression and shared meaning are eroded by the relentless drive for profit and commodification.
Marketing extends far beyond goods and services; it permeates the “market for talent,” where individuals are increasingly treated as commodities, valued for their exchange potential in economic terms. This commodification of people reinforces the capitalist notion that all aspects of life can be assessed through market metrics, further embedding the idea that personal worth is measured by visibility, influence and “personal brand value.” Social media amplifies this effect by transforming even the most personal and personal dimensions of life into marketable content, as individuals present curated versions of themselves to meet the expectations of a digital audience. Here, deep layers of social and intimate life become commercial assets in vast advertising databases, as platforms mine personal moments and identities for their exchange value, monetizing the very fabric of personal and social existence.
Marketing as a cultural force
From a social perspective, marketing extends far beyond promoting products, services, or companies. It actively shapes and defines social meanings and identities, embedding itself deeply into cultural values, power dynamics and global structures. Marketing and branding go beyond emphasizing functional attributes or consumer needs—they construct and communicate cultural and symbolic values that resonate with people’s aspirations, desires and self-concepts. Operating within specific cultural and historical contexts, marketing molds how products and companies are perceived and valued, often reinforcing socially constructed ideas about luxury, status and identity. Through discourses, practices and institutions, marketing and branding become cultural producers, shaping and sustaining social hierarchies, norms and identities that influence everything from self-concept to gender roles and class distinctions.
Power dynamics in marketing narratives
Marketing emphasizes the power and ideological forces at play, as marketers and brand managers operate within social and economic systems that directly shape their practices. Marketing messages are rarely spontaneous; they are rooted in dominant discourses and shaped by existing social norms and economic pressures. Consequently, marketing often amplifies and normalizes established cultural narratives, from consumerism and social class distinctions to traditional gender roles, thereby sustaining power structures and minimizing space for alternative discourses. Although marketing can challenge these norms, its focus on profitability typically results in compliance with, rather than critique of, prevailing ideologies.
Advertising and the shaping of gender roles
Advertising—a key component of marketing—further reveals how gender and identity are both regulated and constrained. Advertising has long been criticized for perpetuating harmful gender stereotypes, frequently framing women as passive objects of desire and associating their value primarily with appearance. Many ads use sexualized portrayals of women to sell unrelated products, reinforcing the notion that women’s value is tied to physical attractiveness and subtly promoting the idea that they exist for male pleasure. Similarly, advertising restricts the portrayal of men, emphasizing strength, independence and control, while discouraging vulnerability or emotional expression. These portrayals limit individuals’ self-expression, confining them to roles that align with traditional gender norms. Advertising also contributes to unrealistic beauty standards, fueling body dissatisfaction, low self-esteem and disordered eating, especially among women who are often targeted by ads promoting unattainable ideals.
Digital marketing and surveillance capitalism
Digital marketing’s reach goes beyond influencing individual consumer choices, extending into public and digital spaces where privacy and personal data are routinely compromised. Through targeted algorithms, digital marketing creates highly personalized ads, capitalizing on detailed psychological insights to shape behavior, stir artificial desires and foster feelings of inadequacy. This manipulation has psychological consequences, affecting mental health, promoting materialistic values and reducing individual autonomy. The surveillance-driven nature of modern marketing enhances consumer vulnerability, diminishing transparency, shaping choices and narrowing freedom—all while often leaving consumers unaware of how data is gathered, used, or sold.
Erosion of privacy and commodification of data
Digital marketing has transformed user data into a commodity, with nearly every online action tracked, analyzed and monetized. Companies collect personal data—sometimes without explicit consent—to create highly targeted ads, eroding user privacy and subtly influencing behavior. Platforms like Facebook and Google profit from this data, while consumers pay with their privacy, often unaware of how their information is used to shape spending habits and reinforce online behaviors.
Impact on youth and childhood
Digital marketing’s impact on youth is particularly concerning, as it exploits developing brains to drive engagement and consumption. Social media and online games use marketing techniques that create endless feedback loops of rewards and validations, making it difficult for young users to disconnect. This constant engagement erodes focus, fosters instant gratification and can harm mental health by promoting unrealistic comparisons, self-esteem issues and a consumerist mindset from an early age. Many critics argue that digital marketing has effectively stolen the innocence and creativity of childhood, replacing it with a shallow quest for validation driven by ads and product placements.
Polarization and the rise of right-wing politics
Digital marketing also plays a key role in amplifying polarized content, as algorithms prioritize engagement over content quality. Polarizing messages, often promoted through targeted ads, generate reactions and increase platform engagement, making them more prominent in users’ feeds. This creates echo chambers where users are exposed primarily to content aligning with their beliefs, deepening societal divides. Right-wing political entities have leveraged this, using targeted marketing to exploit demographic fears, grievances and biases, intensifying right-wing populism, misinformation and political polarization.
The rise of fast fashion and hyper-consumerism
Digital marketing has driven fast fashion’s growth by promoting endless streams of low-cost, trendy clothing that fuel overconsumption. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok serve as channels for fast fashion brands, normalizing rapid trends and encouraging short-lived purchases. This cycle drives unsustainable production and disposal practices, contributing to environmental harm and exploitative labor conditions. By glamorizing fast fashion, digital marketing fosters a “throwaway culture” that undermines sustainable and ethical consumption.
Limbic capitalism and the commercialization of attention
“Limbic capitalism” critiques digital marketing’s exploitation of human psychology, targeting the brain’s limbic system—the center for emotions and impulses—to keep users in an addictive cycle of engagement. By triggering emotions, fears, and desires, digital marketing creates a loop of notifications, personalized ads, and endless scrolling. This cycle fuels what Guy Debord described as the “society of the spectacle,” where devices and platforms monetize attention, fostering a consumer culture built on distraction and addiction rather than meaningful engagement. Prioritizing profit over well-being, this model reduces users to reactive consumers, reinforcing compulsive behaviors for profit.
Degradation of the internet’s original purpose
The internet was initially envisioned as a space for knowledge-sharing, open communication and creativity. Digital marketing has since reshaped this vision, with algorithms that prioritize profit-driven engagement over meaningful content. Most digital spaces now serve advertisers rather than users, favoring clickbait, sponsored content and deceptive ads over accurate information and thoughtful discussion. The internet has become a marketplace where engagement metrics trump quality of information or human connection.
The dominance of platform monopolies
Digital marketing has contributed to the rise of tech monopolies like Google, Facebook and Amazon, whose algorithms and ad systems dominate online information and commerce. These platforms control what users see, shaping public opinion and consumer behavior. Their control creates a closed-loop system where they collect data, sell ads and adjust algorithms to maximize ad revenue, often disadvantaging smaller businesses and content creators. This monopolistic structure reinforces inequality as smaller entities struggle to compete in a landscape dominated by a few powerful players.
Greenwashing and ethical implications
Greenwashing, a common marketing tactic, provides a particularly clear example of how marketing shapes beliefs and actions while manipulating ethical concerns. Greenwashing refers to misleading consumers by exaggerating a product’s environmental benefits to appeal to eco-conscious buyers. Often, greenwashing highlights minor eco-friendly features while obscuring the significant environmental costs associated with a product’s lifecycle, masking the exploitation and depletion embedded in its production. This practice fosters a false sense of assurance, leading consumers to believe they are making environmentally responsible choices while sustaining unsustainable practices.
Consumer agency and the designer’s role
Despite marketing’s strong influence, consumers are not passive recipients; there is room for agency and resistance. Consumers can challenge marketing messages, reinterpreting or rejecting narratives to align with their values. As designers and creators in this field, there is an ethical responsibility to question assumptions, address structures that promote consumerism and redefine the association between happiness and material acquisition.
Modern art is a disaster area. Never in the field of human history has so much been used by so many to say so little.
Banksy
Designers can advocate for ethical consumption by supporting sustainable products, fair trade practices and local industries, shifting emphasis away from mindless consumerism. Additionally, designers can craft alternative narratives that celebrate diversity, promote social justice and encourage a stronger sense of community. This commitment involves creating campaigns that foster critical thinking, helping consumers recognize deceptive practices like greenwashing and make choices that reflect their true values.
The ethical responsibility of marketing in a digital world
As digital marketing becomes pervasive, there is an urgent need to reflect ethically on its role and impact. Critics argue that marketing prioritizes profit over humanity, exploiting personal insecurities and societal divisions for financial gain. Although marketing could drive awareness, encourage responsible consumption and build community, its digital form often fosters dependency, polarization and environmental harm. Given these critiques, there is a call for marketing professionals and platforms to reconsider their impact, implementing ethical standards that protect privacy, promote truthful representation and encourage sustainable practices over short-term profits.
ABOUT THE FOOTNOTES
These footnotes are generated using an experimental AI-assisted process based on a custom GPT, drawing from a Notion database cataloging key scholars, theories and concepts across themes such as design, critical theory, social and political theory, ecological economics and many more.
The AI scans provided texts and recognize concepts and themes I’m discussing and suggests relevant citations from my database. This process also allows for a more journalistic style of footnotes, moving beyond strict academic convention to provide context and narrative that are accessible to a wider audience.
References
- Marketing as a Cultural Force: Marketing’s influence on culture echoes Stuart Hall’s concept of encoding and decoding within media, where messages are imbued with cultural meaning that audiences interpret based on social contexts (Hall, 1980). Similarly, Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of “symbolic capital” helps explain how branding infuses products with social value, shaping tastes and reinforcing cultural hierarchies around luxury, identity, and class distinctions (Bourdieu, Distinction, 1984).
- Reinforcing Capitalist Ideologies: Marketing reinforces capitalist values, aligning with Adorno and Horkheimer’s “culture industry” concept, where cultural practices are commodified for profit, reducing relationships and identities to products (Adorno & Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 1944). This process doesn’t just reflect but actively constructs demand, as Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic capital suggests, assigning social value to consumer goods and reinforcing hierarchies (Bourdieu, Distinction, 1984). Philosopher Bernard Stiegler adds that this commodification results in “symbolic misery,” draining cultural symbols of authentic meaning and turning them into profit-driven artifacts (Stiegler, Symbolic Misery, Vol. 1, 2004).
- Power Dynamics in Marketing Narratives: Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony elucidates how dominant ideologies in marketing gain consent from society, embedding power structures within “common sense” beliefs and practices, thus limiting resistance to capitalist and social norms (Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 1971). This is visible in marketing’s role in reinforcing consumerism and gender norms, reflecting institutional pressures for brand conformity over critical discourse.
- Advertising and Gender Roles: Judith Butler’s work on performativity in gender offers insights into advertising’s role in defining and constraining gender identities. By repeatedly framing women through passive and objectified images, advertising scripts social roles and reinforces binary norms that shape self-identity (Butler, Gender Trouble, 1990). Advertising also perpetuates what Jean Kilbourne criticizes as “toxic cultural norms,” which promote beauty ideals that damage self-esteem and mental health (Kilbourne, Killing Us Softly series, 1979-2010).
- Digital Marketing and Surveillance Capitalism: Shoshana Zuboff’s concept of surveillance capitalism explains how digital marketing operates by monetizing personal data to manipulate and predict consumer behavior, turning personal information into a key commodity (Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 2019). This manipulation aligns with Bernard Stiegler’s critique of “technological control,” where targeted ads subtly erode autonomy, fueling compulsive consumption (Stiegler, Automatic Society, 2016).
- Impact on Youth and Childhood: The digital targeting of youth illustrates Paulo Freire’s “pedagogy of oppression,” where marketing actively conditions young people into consumerist ideologies, shaping early notions of identity, value, and success (Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 1970). The “commercialization of childhood” critique echoes this concern, arguing that incessant marketing stunts creativity and self-expression, replacing them with the pursuit of superficial validation.
- Polarization and Right-Wing Politics: Media theorist Marshall McLuhan’s idea of “the medium is the message” applies here, as digital platforms amplify polarized content based on engagement metrics, creating echo chambers that deepen societal divides (McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964). Algorithm-driven ads manipulate demographic anxieties, which has facilitated the rise of right-wing populism, spreading misinformation and intensifying polarization.
- Rise of Fast Fashion and Hyper-Consumerism: Fast fashion marketing exemplifies what environmental theorist Timothy Morton calls “hyperobjects,” where consumption’s environmental impact is vast and diffuse, obscured by immediate consumer desires (Morton, Hyperobjects, 2013). This marketing-driven culture, especially prevalent on social media, fuels a “throwaway culture” that undermines sustainable practices and promotes wasteful cycles of rapid consumption.
- Limbic Capitalism and Attention Commodification: Historian David T. Courtwright introduced the concept of “limbic capitalism” in The Age of Addiction (2019) to describe business systems that exploit the brain’s pleasure centers to drive excessive consumption and addiction. Courtwright explains that industries like digital marketing leverage neuroscience to create compulsive behaviors, encouraging users to repeatedly seek “quick hits” of brain reward through notifications, personalized ads, and endless scrolling. This cycle aligns with what Guy Debord described as the “society of the spectacle,” where devices and platforms monetize attention, fostering a culture of distraction and addiction rather than meaningful engagement. Prioritizing profit over well-being, this model reduces users to reactive consumers, reinforcing compulsive behaviors to maximize profit.
- Degradation of the Internet’s Purpose: Marketing’s takeover of digital spaces echoes Neil Postman’s warnings in Amusing Ourselves to Death (1985), where he argued that information would eventually become subordinated to entertainment and consumer appeal. The shift from knowledge-sharing to monetized engagement distorts the internet’s potential for communal growth, transforming it into a profit-driven arena where clickbait and shallow content flourish.
- Dominance of Platform Monopolies: Michel Bauwens describes platform monopolies as “netarchical capitalism,” where companies like Google and Facebook create closed systems that centralize control over data, resources and public discourse (Bauwens, “The Political Economy of Peer Production,” 2005). Their dominance limits market competition and curtails diversity of thought, sustaining inequities within the digital economy.
- Greenwashing and Ethical Implications: Greenwashing, which aims to mislead consumers about sustainability, reflects Jean Baudrillard’s concept of “simulacra,” where brands create a hyperreal image of eco-friendliness that masks unsustainable practices, creating a false sense of ethical consumption (Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, 1981). This illusion deters genuine sustainable efforts, as consumers unknowingly support practices that worsen environmental issues.
- Consumer Agency and Designer’s Role: Designers play a crucial role in fostering consumer agency. As Victor Margolin argues, designers should not merely serve market interests but act as “critical agents” who promote ethical values and sustainable practices, creating campaigns that empower rather than manipulate (Margolin, The Politics of the Artificial, 2002). By encouraging consumers to resist deceptive marketing practices, designers can inspire more mindful consumption aligned with personal and social values.